I would like to present an analogy to explain by example.
At least TRY.
My personal belief that I have constantly expessed to the best of my ability over the past 20 some odd years;
OVERESCAPEMENT WILL ENSURE THAT EVEN STRONG STOCKS WILL BECOME WEAK STOCKS!
Alas the 2004 report supplied support for status-quo and only ignorant( Quasi scientists) or fishermen would not accept the "evidence " stated in the study!
At least that is " My " interpretation at the time!
Now if typhoid Mary was to enter a packed elevator on the Empire State building ? (this is my analogy to the past 4 cycles of Fraser River Sockeye escapements...
Now if typhoid Mary was to enter a park with huge open air spaces that limit interaction of airborne
pathogens especially adaptation , mutation that could transfer between the infected or also the potential for transmission " by, OTHER " hosts.
Which provides the best chance for future survival?
Wisdom should provide the answer.
I await with anticipation what is considered the wise choice.
For the future of course!!