Submitter: Tricia Knowles
Community: Prince Rupert
Date Submitted: August 29, 2023
Summary:
Aquaculture represents only one part of the commission’s mandate. Individuals who are truly concerned about aquaculture should also be requesting the commission to investigate B.C. wild hatchery output and disease records, as well as the effect of Alaskan ocean ranched salmon on wild stocks and the interception of Fraser sockeye by commercial fisheries in other areas.
|
Submission:
If “aquaculture” is only one part of the Commission’s mandate to investigate, then why are so many submissions about fish farms – that’s only one part of aquaculture which is only one of the areas of interest.
I agree fish farms should be looked at, but this focus is quite obvious and very annoying. Is there an effort by a few individuals to make fish farms a focus because they are interested in seeing market competition wiped out? Are they actually paid to make this noise and ‘rally the masses’?
If they were trully concerned about “aquaculture”, then they would also be requesting that the Commission look into wild salmon hatchery outputs and disease records in BC, and also the effects of ocean ranched salmon in Alaska (disease transfer, feed consumption, interbreeding) and interception of Fraser sockeye during the commercial catches of hatchery salmon in northern regions.
Seems this focus on fish farms is narrow minded and political. I trust Judge Cohen is able to filter this “noise” out.
|